Von dem Buch ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS haben wir 3 gleiche oder sehr ähnliche Ausgaben identifiziert!
Falls Sie nur an einem bestimmten Exempar interessiert sind, können Sie aus der folgenden Liste jenes wählen, an dem Sie interessiert sind:
100%: David S. Evans: ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS (ISBN: 9781950769421) Competition Policy International, in Englisch, auch als eBook.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
85%: David S. Evans/ Richard Schmalensee: Antitrust Analysis of Platform Markets: Why the Supreme Court Got It Right in American Express (ISBN: 9781950769407) 2019, in Englisch, Broschiert.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
76%: David S. Evans/ Richard Schmalensee: ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS (ISBN: 9781950769414) 2019, Competition Policy International, in Englisch, Taschenbuch.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS - 11 Angebote vergleichen
Bester Preis: € 9,49 (vom 18.02.2020)1
ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS - Why the Supreme Court Got It Right in American Express
~EN NW EB DLISBN: 9781950769421 bzw. 1950769429, vermutlich in Englisch, Competition Policy International, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS: This book explores the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court`s ruling in Ohio et al. v. American Express, and the preceding litigation, for the treatment of multisided platforms under U.S. antitrust law. It is based on a series of articles that the authors wrote (either jointly or individually), leading up to and in the aftermath of the Supreme Court`s decision. Englisch, Ebook.
2
ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS: Why the Supreme Court Got It Right in American Express David S. Evans Author
~EN HC NWISBN: 9781950769407 bzw. 1950769402, vermutlich in Englisch, Competition Policy International, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, In Stock, plus shipping.
This book explores the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Ohio et al. v. American Express, and the preceding litigation, for the treatment of multisided platforms under U.S. antitrust law. It is based on a series of articles that the authors wrote (either jointly or individually), leading up to and in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision.The authors consider that the Supreme Court ruling provides valuable guidance for antitrust analysis in such markets. This book emphasizes the importance for enforcers and the judiciary to take full account of the multisided nature of certain markets, not only in payment services, but throughout the economy (including other types of multisided platforms, which are particularly common in online digital markets).Although Evans and Schmalensee agree with the Supreme Court’s reasoning, this book nonetheless sets out criticisms of the Supreme Court’s ruling. The authors address such criticisms, based on our (and other legal and economic practitioners’ and academics’) understanding of the modern economic theories on multisided markets. In particular, Schmalensee underline the need for decisionmakers to take into account any alleged anticompetitive harm and benefits to participants on both sides of a multisided platform, before coming to any conclusion that there has been antitrust injury as a result of any given conduct.Of particular importance, and emphasized throughout this book, is the need to undertake a full rule of reason analysis of conduct in multisided markets, consistent with both long-standing antitrust precedent and modern economic theory. A proper assessment must take into account the multisided nature of certain markets in all steps of antitrust analysis, whether the issue at hand relates to alleged monopolization, coordinated behavior, or a merger. Given the prevalence of multisided platforms, similar allegations of antitrust harm are sure to arise time and again in the years to come, and there are many unanswered questions. For convenience, as Appendices, the books also includes the text of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, an amicus brief filed jointly by 28 antitrust professors, an amicus brief filed jointly by 8 economists, and the brief filed by the U.S. on behalf of the petitioners.
This book explores the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Ohio et al. v. American Express, and the preceding litigation, for the treatment of multisided platforms under U.S. antitrust law. It is based on a series of articles that the authors wrote (either jointly or individually), leading up to and in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision.The authors consider that the Supreme Court ruling provides valuable guidance for antitrust analysis in such markets. This book emphasizes the importance for enforcers and the judiciary to take full account of the multisided nature of certain markets, not only in payment services, but throughout the economy (including other types of multisided platforms, which are particularly common in online digital markets).Although Evans and Schmalensee agree with the Supreme Court’s reasoning, this book nonetheless sets out criticisms of the Supreme Court’s ruling. The authors address such criticisms, based on our (and other legal and economic practitioners’ and academics’) understanding of the modern economic theories on multisided markets. In particular, Schmalensee underline the need for decisionmakers to take into account any alleged anticompetitive harm and benefits to participants on both sides of a multisided platform, before coming to any conclusion that there has been antitrust injury as a result of any given conduct.Of particular importance, and emphasized throughout this book, is the need to undertake a full rule of reason analysis of conduct in multisided markets, consistent with both long-standing antitrust precedent and modern economic theory. A proper assessment must take into account the multisided nature of certain markets in all steps of antitrust analysis, whether the issue at hand relates to alleged monopolization, coordinated behavior, or a merger. Given the prevalence of multisided platforms, similar allegations of antitrust harm are sure to arise time and again in the years to come, and there are many unanswered questions. For convenience, as Appendices, the books also includes the text of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, an amicus brief filed jointly by 28 antitrust professors, an amicus brief filed jointly by 8 economists, and the brief filed by the U.S. on behalf of the petitioners.
3
ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS: Why the Supreme Court Got It Right in American Express David S. Evans Author
~EN PB NWISBN: 9781950769414 bzw. 1950769410, vermutlich in Englisch, Competition Policy International, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, In Stock, plus shipping.
This book explores the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Ohio et al. v. American Express, and the preceding litigation, for the treatment of multisided platforms under U.S. antitrust law. It is based on a series of articles that the authors wrote (either jointly or individually), leading up to and in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision.The authors consider that the Supreme Court ruling provides valuable guidance for antitrust analysis in such markets. This book emphasizes the importance for enforcers and the judiciary to take full account of the multisided nature of certain markets, not only in payment services, but throughout the economy (including other types of multisided platforms, which are particularly common in online digital markets).Although Evans and Schmalensee agree with the Supreme Court’s reasoning, this book nonetheless sets out criticisms of the Supreme Court’s ruling. The authors address such criticisms, based on our (and other legal and economic practitioners’ and academics’) understanding of the modern economic theories on multisided markets. In particular, Schmalensee underline the need for decisionmakers to take into account any alleged anticompetitive harm and benefits to participants on both sides of a multisided platform, before coming to any conclusion that there has been antitrust injury as a result of any given conduct.Of particular importance, and emphasized throughout this book, is the need to undertake a full rule of reason analysis of conduct in multisided markets, consistent with both long-standing antitrust precedent and modern economic theory. A proper assessment must take into account the multisided nature of certain markets in all steps of antitrust analysis, whether the issue at hand relates to alleged monopolization, coordinated behavior, or a merger. Given the prevalence of multisided platforms, similar allegations of antitrust harm are sure to arise time and again in the years to come, and there are many unanswered questions. For convenience, as Appendices, the books also includes the text of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, an amicus brief filed jointly by 28 antitrust professors, an amicus brief filed jointly by 8 economists, and the brief filed by the U.S. on behalf of the petitioners.
This book explores the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Ohio et al. v. American Express, and the preceding litigation, for the treatment of multisided platforms under U.S. antitrust law. It is based on a series of articles that the authors wrote (either jointly or individually), leading up to and in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision.The authors consider that the Supreme Court ruling provides valuable guidance for antitrust analysis in such markets. This book emphasizes the importance for enforcers and the judiciary to take full account of the multisided nature of certain markets, not only in payment services, but throughout the economy (including other types of multisided platforms, which are particularly common in online digital markets).Although Evans and Schmalensee agree with the Supreme Court’s reasoning, this book nonetheless sets out criticisms of the Supreme Court’s ruling. The authors address such criticisms, based on our (and other legal and economic practitioners’ and academics’) understanding of the modern economic theories on multisided markets. In particular, Schmalensee underline the need for decisionmakers to take into account any alleged anticompetitive harm and benefits to participants on both sides of a multisided platform, before coming to any conclusion that there has been antitrust injury as a result of any given conduct.Of particular importance, and emphasized throughout this book, is the need to undertake a full rule of reason analysis of conduct in multisided markets, consistent with both long-standing antitrust precedent and modern economic theory. A proper assessment must take into account the multisided nature of certain markets in all steps of antitrust analysis, whether the issue at hand relates to alleged monopolization, coordinated behavior, or a merger. Given the prevalence of multisided platforms, similar allegations of antitrust harm are sure to arise time and again in the years to come, and there are many unanswered questions. For convenience, as Appendices, the books also includes the text of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, an amicus brief filed jointly by 28 antitrust professors, an amicus brief filed jointly by 8 economists, and the brief filed by the U.S. on behalf of the petitioners.
6
Antitrust Analysis of Platform Markets: Why the Supreme Court Got It Right in American Express
~EN HC NWISBN: 1950769402 bzw. 9781950769407, vermutlich in Englisch, LIGHTNING SOURCE INC, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Antitrust Analysis of Platform Markets: Why the Supreme Court Got It Right in American Express ab 39.99 € als gebundene Ausgabe: . Aus dem Bereich: Bücher, Wissenschaft, Jura,.
7
ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS
~EN HC NWISBN: 1950769402 bzw. 9781950769407, vermutlich in Englisch, Competition Policy International, gebundenes Buch, neu.
ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS ab 66.99 € als gebundene Ausgabe: Why the Supreme Court Got It Right in American Express. Aus dem Bereich: Bücher, Wissenschaft, Jura,.
9
ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS
~EN PB NWISBN: 1950769410 bzw. 9781950769414, vermutlich in Englisch, Competition Policy International, Taschenbuch, neu.
ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS ab 50.99 € als Taschenbuch: Why the Supreme Court Got It Right in American Express. Aus dem Bereich: Bücher, Taschenbücher, Wirtschaft & Soziales,.
10
ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS (2019)
~EN HC NWISBN: 9781950769407 bzw. 1950769402, vermutlich in Englisch, gebundenes Buch, neu, mit Einband.
Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Next Day, plus shipping.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Lade…