Von dem Buch The Principles of Judicial Proof Volume 1; As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials haben wir 2 gleiche oder sehr ähnliche Ausgaben identifiziert!
Falls Sie nur an einem bestimmten Exempar interessiert sind, können Sie aus der folgenden Liste jenes wählen, an dem Sie interessiert sind:
100%: Wigmore, John Henry: The Principles of Judicial Proof Volume 1; As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials (ISBN: 9781236436870) Rarebooksclub.com, in Englisch, Band: 1, Taschenbuch.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
82%: Wigmore, John Henry: The Principles of Judicial Proof: as Given By Logic Psychology and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials (ISBN: 9780837727455) 1988, in Englisch, Broschiert.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
The Principles of Judicial Proof Volume 1; As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials
9 Angebote vergleichen
Bester Preis: € 106,58 (vom 21.10.2018)1
Symbolbild
The Principles of Judicial Proof Volume 1 As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials (1913)
EN PB NW RPISBN: 9781236436870 bzw. 1236436873, Band: 1, in Englisch, RareBooksClub, Taschenbuch, neu, Nachdruck.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Free shipping.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, BuySomeBooks [52360437], Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.
This item is printed on demand. 686 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 1.4in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 Excerpt: . . . harmonious than the testimony; they unanimously avoided the grossest errors of the witness; and their average error, 20. 6 per cent, was not so high as the witnesses average, 27 per cent; . . moreover, they all picked out the very same witness as the most trustworthy, and this witness was in fact the best one. Again in Detmolds experiment, he found that in spite of the numerous omissions and errors in the testimony, it is possible by comparison of a number of them to put together a correct picture of the occurrence, at least in its essentials. And finally, in Gunthers experiment, he reports, It is very satisfactory to note that, in the identification of the person charged, in spite of the great inconsistencies of the testimony, the correct result was found; for both findings were 100 per cent correct, though the average correctness of the witnesses was only 80. 6 per cent. . . . The average for correctness of the entire finding was 90. 6 per cent for one judge, and 87. 4 per cent for the other, though the average of correctness for the witnesses was only 79. 9 per cent. Is it not safe to say that neither the absolute nor the relative inefficiency or untrustworthiness of a jurys or judges finding of fact ought to be positively asserted until after an extended series of experiments in which such a finding has been included The few such experiments hitherto made give some ground for assuming that the testimonial errors, as detected in the experiments, are to a greater or less extent without influence on the verdict. TITLE III (continued): TESTIMONIAL INTERPRETATION SUBTITLE B: EXTENT AND SOURCES OF ERROR AS INDICATED BY SOME COMMON TESTIMONIAL INCIDENTS Topic 1. Defective Basis of Perception 296. ELIZABETH CANNINGS TRIAL. (1754. How. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, BuySomeBooks [52360437], Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.
This item is printed on demand. 686 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 1.4in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 Excerpt: . . . harmonious than the testimony; they unanimously avoided the grossest errors of the witness; and their average error, 20. 6 per cent, was not so high as the witnesses average, 27 per cent; . . moreover, they all picked out the very same witness as the most trustworthy, and this witness was in fact the best one. Again in Detmolds experiment, he found that in spite of the numerous omissions and errors in the testimony, it is possible by comparison of a number of them to put together a correct picture of the occurrence, at least in its essentials. And finally, in Gunthers experiment, he reports, It is very satisfactory to note that, in the identification of the person charged, in spite of the great inconsistencies of the testimony, the correct result was found; for both findings were 100 per cent correct, though the average correctness of the witnesses was only 80. 6 per cent. . . . The average for correctness of the entire finding was 90. 6 per cent for one judge, and 87. 4 per cent for the other, though the average of correctness for the witnesses was only 79. 9 per cent. Is it not safe to say that neither the absolute nor the relative inefficiency or untrustworthiness of a jurys or judges finding of fact ought to be positively asserted until after an extended series of experiments in which such a finding has been included The few such experiments hitherto made give some ground for assuming that the testimonial errors, as detected in the experiments, are to a greater or less extent without influence on the verdict. TITLE III (continued): TESTIMONIAL INTERPRETATION SUBTITLE B: EXTENT AND SOURCES OF ERROR AS INDICATED BY SOME COMMON TESTIMONIAL INCIDENTS Topic 1. Defective Basis of Perception 296. ELIZABETH CANNINGS TRIAL. (1754. How. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.
2
The Principles of Judicial Proof Volume 1; As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials (2012)
EN PB USISBN: 9781236436870 bzw. 1236436873, Band: 1, in Englisch, 686 Seiten, RareBooksClub.com, Taschenbuch, gebraucht.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Usually ships in 4-5 business days, Real shipping costs can differ.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, super_star_seller.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 Excerpt: ...harmonious than the testimony; they unanimously avoided the grossest errors of the witness; and their average error, 20.6 per cent, was not so high as the witnesses' average, 27 per cent;... moreover, they all picked out the very same witness as the most trustworthy, and this witness was in fact the best one." Again in Detmold's experiment, he found that "in spite of the numerous omissions and errors in the testimony, it is possible by comparison of a number of them to put together a correct picture of the occurrence, at least in its essentials." And finally, in Gunther's experiment, he reports, "It is very satisfactory to note that, in the identification of the person charged, in spite of the great inconsistencies of the testimony, the correct result was found; for both findings were 100 per cent correct, though the average correctness of the witnesses was only 80.6 per cent.... The average for correctness of the entire finding was 90.6 per cent for one judge, and 87.4 per cent for the other, though the average of correctness for the witnesses was only 79.9 per cent." Is it not safe to say that neither the absolute nor the relative inefficiency or untrustworthiness of a jury's or judge's finding of fact ought to be positively asserted until after an extended series of experiments in which such a finding has been included? The few such experiments hitherto made give some ground for assuming that the testimonial errors, as detected in the experiments, are to a greater or less extent without influence on the verdict. TITLE III (continued): TESTIMONIAL INTERPRETATION SUBTITLE B: EXTENT AND SOURCES OF ERROR AS INDICATED BY SOME COMMON TESTIMONIAL INCIDENTS Topic 1. Defective Basis of Perception 296. ELIZABETH CANNING'S TRIAL. (1754. How... Paperback, Label: RareBooksClub.com, RareBooksClub.com, Product group: Book, Published: 2012-05-22, Studio: RareBooksClub.com, Sales rank: 16957981.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, super_star_seller.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 Excerpt: ...harmonious than the testimony; they unanimously avoided the grossest errors of the witness; and their average error, 20.6 per cent, was not so high as the witnesses' average, 27 per cent;... moreover, they all picked out the very same witness as the most trustworthy, and this witness was in fact the best one." Again in Detmold's experiment, he found that "in spite of the numerous omissions and errors in the testimony, it is possible by comparison of a number of them to put together a correct picture of the occurrence, at least in its essentials." And finally, in Gunther's experiment, he reports, "It is very satisfactory to note that, in the identification of the person charged, in spite of the great inconsistencies of the testimony, the correct result was found; for both findings were 100 per cent correct, though the average correctness of the witnesses was only 80.6 per cent.... The average for correctness of the entire finding was 90.6 per cent for one judge, and 87.4 per cent for the other, though the average of correctness for the witnesses was only 79.9 per cent." Is it not safe to say that neither the absolute nor the relative inefficiency or untrustworthiness of a jury's or judge's finding of fact ought to be positively asserted until after an extended series of experiments in which such a finding has been included? The few such experiments hitherto made give some ground for assuming that the testimonial errors, as detected in the experiments, are to a greater or less extent without influence on the verdict. TITLE III (continued): TESTIMONIAL INTERPRETATION SUBTITLE B: EXTENT AND SOURCES OF ERROR AS INDICATED BY SOME COMMON TESTIMONIAL INCIDENTS Topic 1. Defective Basis of Perception 296. ELIZABETH CANNING'S TRIAL. (1754. How... Paperback, Label: RareBooksClub.com, RareBooksClub.com, Product group: Book, Published: 2012-05-22, Studio: RareBooksClub.com, Sales rank: 16957981.
3
The Principles of Judicial Proof Volume 1; As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Tria (1913)
ENISBN: 9781236436870 bzw. 1236436873, Band: 1, in Englisch, Rarebooksclub.com.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, In Stock.
The Principles of Judicial Proof Volume 1; As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials Wigmore, John Henry, This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 Excerpt: ...harmonious than the testimony; they unanimously avoided the grossest errors of the witness; and their average error, 20.6 per cent, was not so high as the witnesses' average, 27 per cent;... moreover, they all picked out the very same witness as the most trustworthy, and this witness was in fact the best one." Again in Detmold's experiment, he found that "in spite of the numerous omissions and errors in the testimony, it is possible by comparison of a number of them to put together a correct picture of the occurrence, at least in its essentials." And finally, in Gunther's experiment, he reports, "It is very satisfactory to note that, in the identification of the person charged, in spite of the great inconsistencies of the testimony, the correct result was found; for both findings were 100 per cent correct, though the average correctness of the witnesses was only 80.6 per cent.... The average for correctness of the entire finding was 90.6 per cent for one judge, and 87.4 per cent for the other, though the average of correctness for the witnesses was only 79.9 per cent." Is it not safe to say that neither the absolute nor the relative inefficiency or untrustworthiness of a jury's or judge's finding of fact ought to be positively asserted until after an extended series of experiments in which such a finding has been included? The few such experiments hitherto made give some ground for assuming that the testimonial errors, as detected in the experiments, are to a greater or less extent without influence on the verdict. TITLE III (continued): TESTIMONIAL INTERPRETATION SUBTITLE B: EXTENT AND SOURCES OF ERROR AS INDICATED BY SOME COMMON TESTIMONIAL INCIDENTS Topic 1. Defective Basis of Perception 296. ELIZABETH CANNING'S TRIAL. (1754. How...
The Principles of Judicial Proof Volume 1; As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials Wigmore, John Henry, This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 Excerpt: ...harmonious than the testimony; they unanimously avoided the grossest errors of the witness; and their average error, 20.6 per cent, was not so high as the witnesses' average, 27 per cent;... moreover, they all picked out the very same witness as the most trustworthy, and this witness was in fact the best one." Again in Detmold's experiment, he found that "in spite of the numerous omissions and errors in the testimony, it is possible by comparison of a number of them to put together a correct picture of the occurrence, at least in its essentials." And finally, in Gunther's experiment, he reports, "It is very satisfactory to note that, in the identification of the person charged, in spite of the great inconsistencies of the testimony, the correct result was found; for both findings were 100 per cent correct, though the average correctness of the witnesses was only 80.6 per cent.... The average for correctness of the entire finding was 90.6 per cent for one judge, and 87.4 per cent for the other, though the average of correctness for the witnesses was only 79.9 per cent." Is it not safe to say that neither the absolute nor the relative inefficiency or untrustworthiness of a jury's or judge's finding of fact ought to be positively asserted until after an extended series of experiments in which such a finding has been included? The few such experiments hitherto made give some ground for assuming that the testimonial errors, as detected in the experiments, are to a greater or less extent without influence on the verdict. TITLE III (continued): TESTIMONIAL INTERPRETATION SUBTITLE B: EXTENT AND SOURCES OF ERROR AS INDICATED BY SOME COMMON TESTIMONIAL INCIDENTS Topic 1. Defective Basis of Perception 296. ELIZABETH CANNING'S TRIAL. (1754. How...
4
The Principles of Judicial Proof: As Given by Logic Psychology and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials (1988)
EN HCISBN: 9780837727455 bzw. 0837727456, in Englisch, Fred B Rothman & Co, gebundenes Buch.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Books Express [61727479], Portsmouth, NH, U.S.A.
We ship International with Tracking Number! May not contain Access Codes or Supplements. Buy with confidence, excellent customer service! L.
We ship International with Tracking Number! May not contain Access Codes or Supplements. Buy with confidence, excellent customer service! L.
5
Principles of Judicial Proof: As Given by Logic, Psychology and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials
EN HC NWISBN: 9780837727455 bzw. 0837727456, in Englisch, Hein, William S. & Company, Incorporated, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Lagernd.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
6
Symbolbild
The Principles of Judicial Proof: as Given By Logic Psychology and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials (1988)
EN HC USISBN: 9780837727455 bzw. 0837727456, in Englisch, Fred B Rothman & Co, gebundenes Buch, gebraucht.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, zzgl. Versandkosten, Verandgebiet: DOM.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Books Express, NH, Portsmouth, [RE:4].
Hardcover.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Books Express, NH, Portsmouth, [RE:4].
Hardcover.
7
Symbolbild
The Principles of Judicial Proof: as Given By Logic Psychology and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials (1988)
EN HC NWISBN: 9780837727455 bzw. 0837727456, in Englisch, Fred B Rothman & Co, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, zzgl. Versandkosten, Verandgebiet: DOM.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, ExtremelyReliable, TX, Richmond, [RE:4].
Hardcover.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, ExtremelyReliable, TX, Richmond, [RE:4].
Hardcover.
8
Symbolbild
The Principles of Judicial Proof Volume 1; As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials (2012)
EN PB NWISBN: 9781236436870 bzw. 1236436873, Band: 1, in Englisch, RareBooksClub.com, Taschenbuch, neu.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Irish Booksellers [57531671], Portland, ME, U.S.A.
9
Lade…