The resurrection of Christ - 5 Angebote vergleichen
Bester Preis: € 11,76 (vom 08.09.2017)1
Symbolbild
The resurrection of Christ (1845)
EN PB NW RP
ISBN: 9781231815724 bzw. 1231815728, in Englisch, RareBooksClub, Taschenbuch, neu, Nachdruck.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, BuySomeBooks [52360437], Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.
This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 28 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.1in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1845 Excerpt: . . . of the day, we are, upon this principle, to account the word a deception because it subsequently appears that these men, at least two of them, were angels. Thus too, when it is said of the women that came in the morning to the sepulchre and entered in, behold, two men in shining garments stood by them, we see not why this is not also a deception. The fact is, if this principle be admitted it will make sad havoc of a large part of the sacred volume. Hundreds of passages might be adduced where it is obvious, at a glance, that the primary sense of the letter cannot be received as its genuine teaching. Take as an illustration our Saviours declaration in John: Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Now it is obvious that the Jews who were present took this in its most literal sense, as referring to the temple built first by Solomon and afterwards rebuilt by Herod. Our Lord was actually in the temple at the time he uttered the words, and what should lead them to suppose that he meant any other 1 The Evangelist tells us indeed that he spake of the temple of his body, but there is no evidence that he told the Jews that he spake of his body, and it is evident, from the use which they made of the circumstance at his trial, that they still retained this impression, and that there was a sense in which they were misled. Nor was it till after his resurrection that the disciples themselves put the right construction upon his words. But will any one from this assert that our Saviour was a deceiver 1 Yet why not, if the same charge is to be fastened upon him from the language employed in speaking of his body after the resurrection Thus, again we read that Enoch walked with God, and was n. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.
This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 28 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.1in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1845 Excerpt: . . . of the day, we are, upon this principle, to account the word a deception because it subsequently appears that these men, at least two of them, were angels. Thus too, when it is said of the women that came in the morning to the sepulchre and entered in, behold, two men in shining garments stood by them, we see not why this is not also a deception. The fact is, if this principle be admitted it will make sad havoc of a large part of the sacred volume. Hundreds of passages might be adduced where it is obvious, at a glance, that the primary sense of the letter cannot be received as its genuine teaching. Take as an illustration our Saviours declaration in John: Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Now it is obvious that the Jews who were present took this in its most literal sense, as referring to the temple built first by Solomon and afterwards rebuilt by Herod. Our Lord was actually in the temple at the time he uttered the words, and what should lead them to suppose that he meant any other 1 The Evangelist tells us indeed that he spake of the temple of his body, but there is no evidence that he told the Jews that he spake of his body, and it is evident, from the use which they made of the circumstance at his trial, that they still retained this impression, and that there was a sense in which they were misled. Nor was it till after his resurrection that the disciples themselves put the right construction upon his words. But will any one from this assert that our Saviour was a deceiver 1 Yet why not, if the same charge is to be fastened upon him from the language employed in speaking of his body after the resurrection Thus, again we read that Enoch walked with God, and was n. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.
2
The resurrection of Christ (2012)
EN PB NW
ISBN: 9781231815724 bzw. 1231815728, in Englisch, 28 Seiten, RareBooksClub.com, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Usually ships in 2 to 4 weeks.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Amazon.com.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1845 Excerpt: ...of the day, we are, upon this principle, to account the word a deception because it subsequently appears that these men, at least two of them, were angels. Thus too, when it is said of the women that came in the morning to the sepulchre and entered in, "behold, two men in shining garments stood by them," we see not why this is not also a deception. The fact is, if this principle be admitted it will make sad havoc of a large part of the sacred volume. Hundreds of passages might be adduced where it is obvious, at a glance, that the primary sense of the letter cannot be received as its genuine teaching. Take as an illustration our Saviour's declaration in John: "Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." Now it is obvious that the Jews who were present took this in its most literal sense, as referring to the temple built first by Solomon and afterwards rebuilt by Herod. Our Lord was actually in the temple at the time he uttered the words, and what should lead them to suppose that he meant any other 1 The Evangelist tells us indeed that he spake of the temple of his body, but there is no evidence that he told the Jews that he spake of his body, and it is evident, from the use which they made of the circumstance at his trial, that they still retained this impression, and that there was a sense in which they were misled. Nor was it till after his resurrection that the disciples themselves put the right construction upon his words. But will any one from this assert that our Saviour was a deceiver 1 Yet why not, if the same charge is to be fastened upon him from the language employed in speaking of his body after the resurrection? Thus, again we read that " Enoch walked with God, and was n... Paperback, Label: RareBooksClub.com, RareBooksClub.com, Product group: Book, Published: 2012-05-14, Studio: RareBooksClub.com, Sales rank: 15433894.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Amazon.com.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1845 Excerpt: ...of the day, we are, upon this principle, to account the word a deception because it subsequently appears that these men, at least two of them, were angels. Thus too, when it is said of the women that came in the morning to the sepulchre and entered in, "behold, two men in shining garments stood by them," we see not why this is not also a deception. The fact is, if this principle be admitted it will make sad havoc of a large part of the sacred volume. Hundreds of passages might be adduced where it is obvious, at a glance, that the primary sense of the letter cannot be received as its genuine teaching. Take as an illustration our Saviour's declaration in John: "Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." Now it is obvious that the Jews who were present took this in its most literal sense, as referring to the temple built first by Solomon and afterwards rebuilt by Herod. Our Lord was actually in the temple at the time he uttered the words, and what should lead them to suppose that he meant any other 1 The Evangelist tells us indeed that he spake of the temple of his body, but there is no evidence that he told the Jews that he spake of his body, and it is evident, from the use which they made of the circumstance at his trial, that they still retained this impression, and that there was a sense in which they were misled. Nor was it till after his resurrection that the disciples themselves put the right construction upon his words. But will any one from this assert that our Saviour was a deceiver 1 Yet why not, if the same charge is to be fastened upon him from the language employed in speaking of his body after the resurrection? Thus, again we read that " Enoch walked with God, and was n... Paperback, Label: RareBooksClub.com, RareBooksClub.com, Product group: Book, Published: 2012-05-14, Studio: RareBooksClub.com, Sales rank: 15433894.
3
The resurrection of Christ (2012)
EN PB US
ISBN: 9781231815724 bzw. 1231815728, in Englisch, 28 Seiten, RareBooksClub.com, Taschenbuch, gebraucht.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Usually ships in 1-2 business days.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, super_star_seller.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1845 Excerpt: ...of the day, we are, upon this principle, to account the word a deception because it subsequently appears that these men, at least two of them, were angels. Thus too, when it is said of the women that came in the morning to the sepulchre and entered in, "behold, two men in shining garments stood by them," we see not why this is not also a deception. The fact is, if this principle be admitted it will make sad havoc of a large part of the sacred volume. Hundreds of passages might be adduced where it is obvious, at a glance, that the primary sense of the letter cannot be received as its genuine teaching. Take as an illustration our Saviour's declaration in John: "Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." Now it is obvious that the Jews who were present took this in its most literal sense, as referring to the temple built first by Solomon and afterwards rebuilt by Herod. Our Lord was actually in the temple at the time he uttered the words, and what should lead them to suppose that he meant any other 1 The Evangelist tells us indeed that he spake of the temple of his body, but there is no evidence that he told the Jews that he spake of his body, and it is evident, from the use which they made of the circumstance at his trial, that they still retained this impression, and that there was a sense in which they were misled. Nor was it till after his resurrection that the disciples themselves put the right construction upon his words. But will any one from this assert that our Saviour was a deceiver 1 Yet why not, if the same charge is to be fastened upon him from the language employed in speaking of his body after the resurrection? Thus, again we read that " Enoch walked with God, and was n... Paperback, Label: RareBooksClub.com, RareBooksClub.com, Product group: Book, Published: 2012-05-14, Studio: RareBooksClub.com, Sales rank: 15433894.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, super_star_seller.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1845 Excerpt: ...of the day, we are, upon this principle, to account the word a deception because it subsequently appears that these men, at least two of them, were angels. Thus too, when it is said of the women that came in the morning to the sepulchre and entered in, "behold, two men in shining garments stood by them," we see not why this is not also a deception. The fact is, if this principle be admitted it will make sad havoc of a large part of the sacred volume. Hundreds of passages might be adduced where it is obvious, at a glance, that the primary sense of the letter cannot be received as its genuine teaching. Take as an illustration our Saviour's declaration in John: "Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." Now it is obvious that the Jews who were present took this in its most literal sense, as referring to the temple built first by Solomon and afterwards rebuilt by Herod. Our Lord was actually in the temple at the time he uttered the words, and what should lead them to suppose that he meant any other 1 The Evangelist tells us indeed that he spake of the temple of his body, but there is no evidence that he told the Jews that he spake of his body, and it is evident, from the use which they made of the circumstance at his trial, that they still retained this impression, and that there was a sense in which they were misled. Nor was it till after his resurrection that the disciples themselves put the right construction upon his words. But will any one from this assert that our Saviour was a deceiver 1 Yet why not, if the same charge is to be fastened upon him from the language employed in speaking of his body after the resurrection? Thus, again we read that " Enoch walked with God, and was n... Paperback, Label: RareBooksClub.com, RareBooksClub.com, Product group: Book, Published: 2012-05-14, Studio: RareBooksClub.com, Sales rank: 15433894.
5
Symbolbild
The Resurrection of Christ (2012)
EN PB NW
ISBN: 9781231815724 bzw. 1231815728, in Englisch, Rarebooksclub.com, Miami FL, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, plus shipping, Shipping area: DOM.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Through The Stacks LLC, NY, Brockport, [RE:3].
Ships worldwide with delivery confirmation. Trade paperback.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Through The Stacks LLC, NY, Brockport, [RE:3].
Ships worldwide with delivery confirmation. Trade paperback.
Lade…