Biblical Revision; Its Necessity and Purpose, by Members of the American Revision Committee (Paperback)
5 Angebote vergleichen

Von Händler/Antiquariat, BuySomeBooks [52360437], Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.
This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 48 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.1in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1879 Excerpt: . . . any use of them. The text of the common version appears to agree more nearly with that of the later editions of Beza than with any other; but Beza followed very closely Robert Stephenss edition of 1550, and Stephenss again was little more than a reprint of the fourth edition of Erasmus (1527). Erasmus used as the basis of his text in the Gospels an inferior manuscript of the fifteenth century, and one of the thirteenth or fourteenth century in the Acts and Epistles. In the Revelation he had only an inaccurate transcript of a mutilated manuscript (wanting the last six verses) of little value, the real and supposed defects of which he supplied by translating from the Latin Vulgate into Greek. Besides this, he had in all, for his later editions, three manuscripts of the Gospels, four of the Acts and Catholic Epistles, and five of the Pauline Epistles, together with the text of the Aldine edition of 1518, and of the Complutensian Polyglot, both of little critical value. In select passages he had also collations of some other manuscripts. The result of the whole is, that in a considerable number of cases, not to be sure, of great importance, the reading of the common English version is supported by no known Greek manuscript whatever, but rests on an error of Erasmus or Beza (e. g. Acts ix. 5, 6; Rom. vii. 6; 1 Pet. iii. 20; Rev. i. 9, n; ii. 3, 20, 24; iii. 2; v. 10, 14; xv. 3; xvi. 5; xvii. 8, 16; xviii. 2, etc. ); and it is safe to say that in more than a thousand instances fidelity to the true text now ascertained requires a change in the common version, though in most cases the change would be slight. But granting that not many of the changes required can be called important, still, in the case of writings so precious as those of the New Testament, every on. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.

Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Versandkostenfrei.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, The Book Depository [54837791], Gloucester, UK, United Kingdom.
Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1879 Excerpt: .any use of them. The text of the common version appears to agree more nearly with that of the later editions of Beza than with any other; but Beza followed very closely Robert Stephens s edition of 1550, and Stephens s again was little more than a reprint of the fourth edition of Erasmus (1527). Erasmus used as the basis of his text in the Gospels an inferior manuscript of the fifteenth century, and one of the thirteenth or fourteenth century in the Acts and Epistles. In the Revelation he had only an inaccurate transcript of a mutilated manuscript (wanting the last six verses) of little value, the real and supposed defects of which he supplied by translating from the Latin Vulgate into Greek. Besides this, he had in all, for his later editions, three manuscripts of the Gospels, four of the Acts and Catholic Epistles, and five of the Pauline Epistles, together with the text of the Aldine edition of 1518, and of the Complutensian Polyglot, both of little critical value. In select passages he had also collations of some other manuscripts. The result of the whole is, that in a considerable number of cases, not to be sure, of great importance, the reading of the common English version is supported by no known Greek manuscript whatever, but rests on an error of Erasmus or Beza (e. g. Acts ix. 5, 6; Rom. vii. 6; 1 Pet. iii. 20; Rev. i. 9, n; ii. 3, 20, 24; iii. 2; v. 10, 14; xv. 3; xvi. 5; xvii. 8, 16; xviii. 2, etc.); and it is safe to say that in more than a thousand instances fidelity to the true text now ascertained requires a change in the common version, though in most cases the change would be slight. But granting that not many of the changes required can be called important, still, in the case of writings so precious as those of the New Testament, every on.

Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Usually ships in 1-2 business days.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, super_star_seller.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1879 Excerpt: ...any use of them. The text of the common version appears to agree more nearly with that of the later editions of Beza than with any other; but Beza followed very closely Robert Stephens's edition of 1550, and Stephens's again was little more than a reprint of the fourth edition of Erasmus (1527). Erasmus used as the basis of his text in the Gospels an inferior manuscript of the fifteenth century, and one of the thirteenth or fourteenth century in the Acts and Epistles. In the Revelation he had only an inaccurate transcript of a mutilated manuscript (wanting the last six verses) of little value, the real and supposed defects of which he supplied by translating from the Latin Vulgate into Greek. Besides this, he had in all, for his later editions, three manuscripts of the Gospels, four of the Acts and Catholic Epistles, and five of the Pauline Epistles, together with the text of the Aldine edition of 1518, and of the Complutensian Polyglot, both of little critical value. In select passages he had also collations of some other manuscripts. The result of the whole is, that in a considerable number of cases, not to be sure, of great importance, the reading of the common English version is supported by no known Greek manuscript whatever, but rests on an error of Erasmus or Beza (e. g. Acts ix. 5, 6; Rom. vii. 6; 1 Pet. iii. 20; Rev. i. 9, n; ii. 3, 20, 24; iii. 2; v. 10, 14; xv. 3; xvi. 5; xvii. 8, 16; xviii. 2, etc.); and it is safe to say that in more than a thousand instances fidelity to the true text now ascertained requires a change in the common version, though in most cases the change would be slight. But granting that not many of the changes required can be called important, still, in the case of writings so precious as those of the New Testament, every on... Paperback, Label: RareBooksClub.com, RareBooksClub.com, Produktgruppe: Book, Publiziert: 2012-05-08, Studio: RareBooksClub.com.

Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Usually ships in 24 hours.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Amazon.com.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1879 Excerpt: ...any use of them. The text of the common version appears to agree more nearly with that of the later editions of Beza than with any other; but Beza followed very closely Robert Stephens's edition of 1550, and Stephens's again was little more than a reprint of the fourth edition of Erasmus (1527). Erasmus used as the basis of his text in the Gospels an inferior manuscript of the fifteenth century, and one of the thirteenth or fourteenth century in the Acts and Epistles. In the Revelation he had only an inaccurate transcript of a mutilated manuscript (wanting the last six verses) of little value, the real and supposed defects of which he supplied by translating from the Latin Vulgate into Greek. Besides this, he had in all, for his later editions, three manuscripts of the Gospels, four of the Acts and Catholic Epistles, and five of the Pauline Epistles, together with the text of the Aldine edition of 1518, and of the Complutensian Polyglot, both of little critical value. In select passages he had also collations of some other manuscripts. The result of the whole is, that in a considerable number of cases, not to be sure, of great importance, the reading of the common English version is supported by no known Greek manuscript whatever, but rests on an error of Erasmus or Beza (e. g. Acts ix. 5, 6; Rom. vii. 6; 1 Pet. iii. 20; Rev. i. 9, n; ii. 3, 20, 24; iii. 2; v. 10, 14; xv. 3; xvi. 5; xvii. 8, 16; xviii. 2, etc.); and it is safe to say that in more than a thousand instances fidelity to the true text now ascertained requires a change in the common version, though in most cases the change would be slight. But granting that not many of the changes required can be called important, still, in the case of writings so precious as those of the New Testament, every on... Paperback, Label: RareBooksClub.com, RareBooksClub.com, Produktgruppe: Book, Publiziert: 2012-05-08, Studio: RareBooksClub.com.

Von Händler/Antiquariat, BuySomeBooks [52360437], Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.
This item is printed on demand. Paperback. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1879 Excerpt: . . . any use of them. The text of the common version appears to agree more nearly with that of the later editions of Beza than with any other; but Beza followed very closely Robert Stephenss edition of 1550, and Stephenss again was little more than a reprint of the fourth edition of Erasmus (1527). Erasmus used as the basis of his text in the Gospels an inferior manuscript of the fifteenth century, and one of the thirteenth or fourteenth century in the Acts and Epistles. In the Revelation he had only an inaccurate transcript of a mutilated manuscript (wanting the last six verses) of little value, the real and supposed defects of which he supplied by translating from the Latin Vulgate into Greek. Besides this, he had in all, for his later editions, three manuscripts of the Gospels, four of the Acts and Catholic Epistles, and five of the Pauline Epistles, together with the text of the Aldine edition of 1518, and of the Complutensian Polyglot, both of little critical value. In select passages he had also collations of some other manuscripts. The result of the whole is, that in a considerable number of cases, not to be sure, of great importance, the reading of the common English version is supported by no known Greek manuscript whatever, but rests on an error of Erasmus or Beza (e. g. Acts ix. 5, 6; Rom. vii. 6; 1 Pet. iii. 20; Rev. i. 9, n; ii. 3, 20, 24; iii. 2; v. 10, 14; xv. 3; xvi. 5; xvii. 8, 16; xviii. 2, etc. ); and it is safe to say that in more than a thousand instances fidelity to the true text now ascertained requires a change in the common version, though in most cases the change would be slight. But granting that not many of the changes required can be called important, still, in the case of writings so precious as those of the New Testament, every on. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.