Von dem Buch Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis haben wir 2 gleiche oder sehr ähnliche Ausgaben identifiziert!
Falls Sie nur an einem bestimmten Exempar interessiert sind, können Sie aus der folgenden Liste jenes wählen, an dem Sie interessiert sind:
100%: Hietanen, Mika: Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis (ISBN: 9780567581242) 2007, in Englisch, auch als eBook.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
94%: Hietanen, Mika: Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis (The Library of New Testament Studies) (ISBN: 9780567031273) 2007, in Englisch, Broschiert.
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis
7 Angebote vergleichen
Bester Preis: € 19,72 (vom 11.02.2017)1
Pauls Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis
EN HC NWISBN: 9780567031273 bzw. 0567031276, in Englisch, T. & T. Clark Publishers, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Versandkosten nach: USA.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, BuySomeBooks.
T. & T. Clark Publishers. Hardcover. New. Hardcover. 232 pages. Dimensions: 9.2in. x 6.4in. x 0.9in.and lt;p and gt;Galatians is a polemical letter which contains a substantial amount of argumentative passages. Paul evidently wanted to persuade by using the best arguments possible to convince his addressees. Using a state-of-the-art method from the discipline of argumentation analysis, Pauls argumentation can be analysed with a precision that standard exegetical methods cannot provide. The pragma-dialectical method developed in Amsterdam facilitates an analysis which is both descriptive and normative. On the one hand, Pauls argumentation can be described, such as the relationship between premisses and conclusions, the structure of the arguments, and features relating to rhetorical strategy. On the other hand, the method makes it possible to evaluate Pauls argumentation against a set of rules for sound reasoning. Fallacies and problematic arguments can be described accurately. The spiritual nature of Pauls matters do not relieve him of rationality, and Paul himself does not argue as if it did. and lt;p and gt; and lt;br and gt; and lt;p and gt;Pauls argumentation is found problematic in several respects. There is a tension in the text: Paul works a great deal to argue his claims while at the same time giving the impression that he merely wants to declare his standpoints and does not want to carry out an argumentation at all. Many of the conclusions are presented as self-evident, even when they are not. Pauls style is far from an ideal model of the resolution of a dispute. Paul relies heavily on an argumentative strategy with maximal use of rhetorical devices. The analysis shows that a contemporary method of argumentation analysis provides tools necessary to adequately describe and understand both individual arguments and the overarching strategy of the argumentation in a Pauline text. and lt;p and gt; and gt; This item ships from multiple locations. Your book may arrive from Roseburg,OR, La Vergne,TN.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, BuySomeBooks.
T. & T. Clark Publishers. Hardcover. New. Hardcover. 232 pages. Dimensions: 9.2in. x 6.4in. x 0.9in.and lt;p and gt;Galatians is a polemical letter which contains a substantial amount of argumentative passages. Paul evidently wanted to persuade by using the best arguments possible to convince his addressees. Using a state-of-the-art method from the discipline of argumentation analysis, Pauls argumentation can be analysed with a precision that standard exegetical methods cannot provide. The pragma-dialectical method developed in Amsterdam facilitates an analysis which is both descriptive and normative. On the one hand, Pauls argumentation can be described, such as the relationship between premisses and conclusions, the structure of the arguments, and features relating to rhetorical strategy. On the other hand, the method makes it possible to evaluate Pauls argumentation against a set of rules for sound reasoning. Fallacies and problematic arguments can be described accurately. The spiritual nature of Pauls matters do not relieve him of rationality, and Paul himself does not argue as if it did. and lt;p and gt; and lt;br and gt; and lt;p and gt;Pauls argumentation is found problematic in several respects. There is a tension in the text: Paul works a great deal to argue his claims while at the same time giving the impression that he merely wants to declare his standpoints and does not want to carry out an argumentation at all. Many of the conclusions are presented as self-evident, even when they are not. Pauls style is far from an ideal model of the resolution of a dispute. Paul relies heavily on an argumentative strategy with maximal use of rhetorical devices. The analysis shows that a contemporary method of argumentation analysis provides tools necessary to adequately describe and understand both individual arguments and the overarching strategy of the argumentation in a Pauline text. and lt;p and gt; and gt; This item ships from multiple locations. Your book may arrive from Roseburg,OR, La Vergne,TN.
2
Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis (2007)
EN NW EB DLISBN: 9780567581242 bzw. 0567581241, in Englisch, T & T Clark International, T & T Clark International, T & T Clark International, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Lieferung aus: Frankreich, in-stock.
Galatians is a polemical letter which contains a substantial amount of argumentative passages. Paul evidently wanted to persuade by using the best arguments possible to convince his addressees. Using a state-of-the-art method from the discipline of argumentation analysis, Paul's argumentation can be analysed with a precision that standard exegetical methods cannot provide. The pragma-dialectical method developed in Amsterdam facilitates an analysis which is both descriptive and normative. On the one hand, Paul's argumentation can be described, such as the relationship between premisses and conclusions, the structure of the arguments, and features relating to rhetorical strategy. On the other hand, the method makes it possible to evaluate Paul's argumentation against a set of rules for sound reasoning. Fallacies and problematic arguments can be described accurately. The spiritual nature of Paul's matters do not relieve him of rationality, and Paul himself does not argue as if it did. Paul's argumentation is found problematic in several respects. There is a tension in the text: Paul works a great deal to argue his claims while at the same time giving the impression that he merely wants to declare his standpoints and does not want to carry out an argumentation at all. Many of the conclusions are presented as self-evident, even when they are not. Paul's style is far from an ideal model of the resolution of a dispute. Paul relies heavily on an argumentative strategy with maximal use of rhetorical devices. The analysis shows that a contemporary method of argumentation analysis provides tools necessary to adequately describe and understand both individual arguments and the overarching strategy of the argumentation in a Pauline text.
Galatians is a polemical letter which contains a substantial amount of argumentative passages. Paul evidently wanted to persuade by using the best arguments possible to convince his addressees. Using a state-of-the-art method from the discipline of argumentation analysis, Paul's argumentation can be analysed with a precision that standard exegetical methods cannot provide. The pragma-dialectical method developed in Amsterdam facilitates an analysis which is both descriptive and normative. On the one hand, Paul's argumentation can be described, such as the relationship between premisses and conclusions, the structure of the arguments, and features relating to rhetorical strategy. On the other hand, the method makes it possible to evaluate Paul's argumentation against a set of rules for sound reasoning. Fallacies and problematic arguments can be described accurately. The spiritual nature of Paul's matters do not relieve him of rationality, and Paul himself does not argue as if it did. Paul's argumentation is found problematic in several respects. There is a tension in the text: Paul works a great deal to argue his claims while at the same time giving the impression that he merely wants to declare his standpoints and does not want to carry out an argumentation at all. Many of the conclusions are presented as self-evident, even when they are not. Paul's style is far from an ideal model of the resolution of a dispute. Paul relies heavily on an argumentative strategy with maximal use of rhetorical devices. The analysis shows that a contemporary method of argumentation analysis provides tools necessary to adequately describe and understand both individual arguments and the overarching strategy of the argumentation in a Pauline text.
3
Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis (Library of New Testament Studies) (2007)
EN HC USISBN: 9780567031273 bzw. 0567031276, in Englisch, Bloomsbury T&T Clark, gebundenes Buch, gebraucht.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Versandkosten nach: USA.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Fullerstone Books.
Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2007-09-26. Hardcover. Like New/No DJ. Boards lightly edgeworn/scuffed; some shelfwear. Orders will be mailed either on the day ordered or the next business day. Expedited shipping available.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Fullerstone Books.
Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2007-09-26. Hardcover. Like New/No DJ. Boards lightly edgeworn/scuffed; some shelfwear. Orders will be mailed either on the day ordered or the next business day. Expedited shipping available.
4
Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis (Library of New Testament Studies) (2007)
EN HCISBN: 9780567031273 bzw. 0567031276, in Englisch, Bloomsbury T&T Clark, gebundenes Buch.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Versandkosten nach: USA.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Ergodebooks.
Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2007-09-26. Hardcover. Used:Good. Buy with confidence. Excellent Customer Service & Return policy. Ships Fast. 24*7 Customer Service.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Ergodebooks.
Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2007-09-26. Hardcover. Used:Good. Buy with confidence. Excellent Customer Service & Return policy. Ships Fast. 24*7 Customer Service.
5
Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis (Library of New Testament Studies) (2007)
EN HCISBN: 9780567031273 bzw. 0567031276, in Englisch, Bloomsbury T&T Clark, gebundenes Buch.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Versandkosten nach: USA.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Ergodebooks.
Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2007-09-26. Hardcover. Used:Good. Ships Fast. Expedite Shipping Available.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Ergodebooks.
Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2007-09-26. Hardcover. Used:Good. Ships Fast. Expedite Shipping Available.
6
Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis (The Library of New Testament Studies)
EN HC NWISBN: 9780567031273 bzw. 0567031276, in Englisch, Bloomsbury T&T Clark, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Versandkosten nach: USA.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Cloud 9 Books.
Bloomsbury T&T Clark. Hardcover. 0567031276 New Condition. . New.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Cloud 9 Books.
Bloomsbury T&T Clark. Hardcover. 0567031276 New Condition. . New.
Lade…