The new Genuine Aristotle on the body the doctrine Zisong (author)(Chinese Edition)
3 Angebote vergleichen

Preise201320142015
Schnitt 55,34 75,92 91,08
Nachfrage
Bester Preis: 36,28 (vom 11.04.2013)
1
9787010026060 - WANG ZI SONG: The new Genuine Aristotle on the body the doctrine Zisong (author)(Chinese Edition)
Symbolbild
WANG ZI SONG

The new Genuine Aristotle on the body the doctrine Zisong (author)(Chinese Edition) (1997)

Lieferung erfolgt aus/von: China, Volksrepublik NW

ISBN: 9787010026060 bzw. 7010026068, Band: 5, Sprache unbekannt, neu.

36,28 ($ 47,38)¹ + Versand: 13,78 ($ 18,00)¹ = 50,06 ($ 65,38)¹
unverbindlich
Lieferung aus: China, Volksrepublik, Versandkosten nach: DEU.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, cninternationalseller.
paperback. New. Ship out in 2 business day, And Fast shipping, Free Tracking number will be provided after the shipment.Pub Date: 1997 Publisher: People's Publishing House book titles: Aristotle's doctrine about the body. Age: books pricing: the 17.00 yuan book number: B0011A4EGE books of: Wang Zaisong Press: People's Publishing House ISBN number: 9787010026060 Publication Date: October 1. 1997. the first edition of the book Pages: 360 books open number: 32 Dimensions Weight: 19.8x13.8x1.4; 300 g Description Aristotle's doctrine about the body. SYNOPSIS: committed to the domestic book publishing. has always been the aim of my community. In the field of history of philosophy. is fortunate enough to generation after generation of experts and scholars for their support. and published many important works to let the world attention. which regularly treasures precious academic value and wealth of ideas. In order to make it more scale. but also see the system access and cultural heritage. is conducive to the new and old scholars studying these books now merged into the philosophy Shi Jiawen library. Philosophy civilized living soul. We are willing to do some modest philosophy Shi Jiawen library for the philosophy of prosperity and the progress of civilization. We expect to set the library can continue to add new masterpiece. The media recommended foreword in the history of Western philosophy. ontology (oia.Substance) is the most common. very important concept. The body as a philosophical concept analysis to be demonstrated. the first person on Aristotle. The beginning from the ancient Greek philosophy. Aristotle previously proposed body. From the the Thales start after the primitive (). both the materialist philosophers about elements of the material. or the Pythagoreans say number & rdquo ;. the Eleatic School Parmenides. exist until Plato said. concept. are in fact speaking body. However. because they are not yet aware of the Bong concept of body and nature. the number can not yet. Relations and other areas to distinguish. and often confuse them together. resulting in a lot of problems. Aristotle precisely because they are aware of these situations. aware of the need to be the body and other areas of difference between the open. He made this distinction in the context of articles . now is the acceptance and use. So it should be acknowledged that Aristotle This is an area of "the body. is a history of human knowledge forward. However. because this is a start. Aristotle yourself what is the body is still being explored. In his book. in addition to the scope of articles mainly metaphysical This book is almost about half the volume chapter is to discuss issues related directly and body. Exposition of Aristotle's body is not consistent. In the context of articles body and said Metaphysics. it is precisely the opposite; Even in volumes between the metaphysical book. nor is it exactly the same. To these ideas tidying identify clues Asia li want to soil Duo Desi. development and change. it is the task of the History of Philosophy workers. Book attempt to superficial attempts to do in this regard. Engels said: The ancient Greek philosopher born spontaneously dialectical theory. the most knowledgeable people in them Aristotle dialectical thinking anti-Duhring Introduction The main form. In the draft of the Introduction . Engels also said Aristotle. the ancient world Hegel. Engels in the anti-Duhring old sequence. The dialectics said. dialectics Until now only two thinkers. Aristotle and Hegel precisely studied. Thirty years of research for Hegel more. some comrades write some meaningful writings. However. for the study of Aristotle. almost can be said to have not been done. put it so simple. so poor. it is not worthy of the ancient world as well as in some of the history of philosophy textbooks in Aristotle's thinking Hegel in the title. Book want to fill this gap. mat-based work to do. Course. because I am the subject of study Aristotle's doctrine about the body. the body problem can be said to be the core of the idea of "the Aristotelian philosophy (the so-called first philosophy). the book does not fully explored Aristotelian dialectics idea. Physics. Aristotle discussed the movement of things change in the form of space and time. the finite and the infinite. and so dialectics; Metaphysics also some volume chapter is to discuss issues such as contradictory directly . Because there is no direct contact of these ontologies and we discuss issues beyond the scope of this book. However. in the doctrine of Aristotle's ontology. but also many dialectic thinking. The book focused on a problem. that is. the general and individual relations. This series of Aristotle own how to change the thinking about the body. how he rose from the individual things to the understanding of the body - the essence. and how he is critical of Plato's theory of ideas issues are inseparable with the general and individual problems. Lenin's one of the most famous article in the Philosophical Notes the dialectics problem is precisely cites Aristotle talked about Metaphysics individual is generally the case. then discuss general and individual relations . Later in this article. followed Lenin same period wrote a book summary of Aristotelian metaphysics. in the Summary. Lenin quote many segments of Aristotle's general and individual relations discussion of the problem. he certainly both Aristotle on the general's criticism of Plato's idealism and individual relationships. have repeatedly pointed out that while in general and individual dialectics: Aristotle is. & ldquo ; into a childlike state of confusion. caught helpless embarrassment confusion and added. is to figure out the general and individual concept and feel. the essence and phenomenon so dialectics. It is in the body. Aristotle rose from the individual to the general. see the general and some of the dialectical relationship between the individual. but it is on the body. Aristotle can not tell the general and individual dialectics into a helpless confusion on this issue. Why this contradiction. which must be specific analysis of Aristotle's own arguments. in order to clear. This book is by analyzing Aristotle on general and individual expositions. trying to explain his thinking in these contradictions. The why ... Contents Preface Chapter Aristotle proposed ontology concept" Chapter II body is the center - the context of articles section V of the third chapter on body problem - introduced metaphysical the fourth chapter of the book exist and ontology Metaphysics V of the first The first five chapters Chapter XII of the seven or eight chapters Chapter body of principle and reason - metaphysical rational - God is a body - Metaphysics XII five The Chapter Chapter VII as a matrix of the body - Metaphysics VII. the first. second and third chapters of Chapter VIII of the essence is the body - Metaphysics VII fourth. fifth. chapters IX generate and nature - Metaphysics VII seventh. eight. nine chapters Chapter nature and definition - Metaphysics VII. X. XI. XII VII XIII - Chapter XVII. Chapter XII. Chapter 11 general is not the body - metaphysical matter and form - Metaphysics VIII first 13 chapters the ability and potential - metaphysical reality and potential of Chapter 14 of the ninth volume of the first five chapters - Metaphysics the ninth volume after five chapters Chapter 15. number . and & ldquo ; philosophy is not the body - metaphysical Critique of the first five chapters of the thirteenth volume of Chapter XVI Number Theory - metaphysical Platonists volume after 13 chapters Chapter XVII & ldquo the; number is not the first principle of the body - the metaphysical the fourteenth volume Conclusion Appendix Aristotle's criticism of Plato's theory of ideas is a critique of the general idealism - & mdash ; the DEFINITIONS one of the metaphysical Postscript Foreword Preface in the history of Western philosophy. ontology (oia.Substance) is the most common. very important concept. The body as a philosophical concept analysis to be demonstrated. the first person on Aristotle. The beginning from the ancient Greek philosophy. Aristotle previously proposed body. From the the Thales start after the primitive (). both the materialist philosophers about elements of the material. or the Pythagoreans say number & rdquo ;. the Eleatic School Parmenides. exist until Plato said. concept. are in fact speaking body. However. because they are not yet aware of the Bong concept of body and nature. the number can not yet. Relations and other areas to distinguish. and often confuse them together. resulting in a lot of problems. Aristotle precisely because they are aware of these situations. aware of the need to be the body and other areas of difference between the open. He made this distinction in the context of articles . now is the acceptance and use. So it should be acknowledged that Aristotle This is an area of "the body. is a history of human knowledge forward. However. because this is a start. Aristotle yourself what is the body is still being explored. In his book. in addition to the scope of articles mainly metaphysical This book is almost about half the volume chapter is to discuss issues related directly and body. Exposition of Aristotle's body is not consistent. In the context of articles body and said Metaphysics. it is precisely the opposite; Even in volumes between the metaphysical book. nor is it exactly the same. To these ideas tidying identify clues Asia li want to soil Duo Desi. development and change. it is the task of the History of Philosophy workers. Book attempt to superficial attempts to do in this regard. Engels said: The ancient Greek philosopher born spontaneously dialectical theory. the most knowledgeable people in them Aristotle dialectical thinking anti-Duhring Introduction The main form. In the draft of the Introduction . Engels also said Aristotle. the ancient world Hegel. Engels in the anti-Duhring old sequence. The dialectics said. dialectics Until now only two thinkers. Aristotle and Hegel precisely studied. Thirty years of research for Hegel more. some comrades write some meaningful writings. However. for the study of Aristotle. almost can be said to have not been done. put it so simple. so poor. it is not worthy of the ancient world as well as in some of the history of philosophy textbooks in Aristotle's thinking Hegel in the title. Book want to fill this gap. mat-based work to do. Course. because I am the subject of study Aristotle's doctrine about the body. the body problem can be said to be the core of the idea of "the Aristotelian philosophy (the so-called first philosophy). the book does not fully explored Aristotelian dialectics idea. Physics. Aristotle discussed the movement of things change in the form of space and time. the finite and the infinite. and so dialectics; Metaphysics also some volume chapter is to discuss issues such as contradictory directly . Because there is no direct contact of these ontologies and we discuss issues beyond the scope of this book. However. in the doctrine of Aristotle's ontology. but also many dialectic thinking. The book focused on a problem. that is. the general and individual relations. This series of Aristotle own how to change the thinking about the body. how he rose from the individual things to the understanding of the body - the essence. and how he is critical of Plato's theory of ideas issues are inseparable with the general and individual problems. Lenin's one of the most famous article in the Philosophical Notes the dialectics problem is precisely cites Aristotle talked about Metaphysics individual is generally the case. then discuss general and individual relations . Later in this article. followed Lenin same period wrote a book summary of Aristotelian metaphysics. in the Summary. Lenin quote many segments of Aristotle's general and individual relations discussion of the problem. he certainly both Aristotle on the general's criticism of Plato's idealism and individual relationships. have repeatedly pointed out that while in general and individual dialectics: Aristotle is. & ldquo ; into a childlike state of confusion. caught helpless embarrassment confusion and added. is to figure out the general and individual concept and feel. the essence and phenomenon so dialectics. It is in the body. Aristotle rose from the individual to the general. see the general and some of the dialectical relationship between the individual. but it is on the body. Aristotle can not tell the general and individual dialectics into a helpless confusion on this issue. Why this contradiction. which must be specific analysis of Aristotle's own arguments. in order to clear. This book is by analyzing Aristotle on general and individual expositions. trying to explain his thinking in these contradictions. Abstracts Aristotle proposed a standard body: the body is neither a subject can be used to describe. do not exist in something of a subject. He said that this is a real body. a definite meaning. The meaning of this statement is not easy to understand. Aristotle on this issue in the context of articles in section II explained. Stresses where he expressed a subject. a subject ; each of which they are divided into affirmation (a) and negation (b). that the Ia b. a b. four cases. according to four different combinations. he include four types of examples: a a body (Ia). can be expressed. but does not exist in a main body (II-B). such as: & rdquo ; the individual person can be expressed. but by no means exist in the body. and second. there is the main body (II-2). but never expressed body (Ib). such as: the the individual syntax of knowledge exists in the heart. but not express any body Another example: a special kind of white being present in an object. but can not express any thing; three. both can be expressed body ( 2). and there being a main body (II-2). such as: The knowledge existing in that the heart. they can be expressed syntax; 4 is neither present in the body into (II-B). it can not be expressed body (Ib). e.g.. the individual and the individual horse. Aristotle to say here. and our usual idea is not quite the same (There are also differences on the ancient Greek and Chinese). need to be analyzed to illustrate. First. expressed in the main body. This is the logic. A is the main word in this judgment A is B is the main body. and B is the predicate. is expressed in A. What can be expressed in the main. what can not be expressed in the main what standard it can be seen from the above four examples. Aristotle is based on the individual and general distinction. Any individual. something special. for example. he cited the individual knowledge of grammar. special white. the individual and the individual horse these things are individual and special. Aristotle believed that they can not be expressed in the main. Those who can be used to expressed the main things inevitably are universal. general stuff. For example: Socrates is a man. Socrates is ugly. In this judgment. the people and ugly are general and universal things. If we will judge the guest of honor word reversed - man is Socrates. Ugly (person) is Socrates. This is wrong. this judge committed a logical error. Therefore. Aristotle said: Generally speaking. any individual unity of things. it should never be used to describe body. Example that the general people can be expressed in the main. can not be expressed in the main body of the individual person: general knowledge representation the main (syntax) - syntax knowledge This judgment is individual knowledge of grammar is not expressed in the main body. Second. with regard to existence to the body. This is not from logic. but from the aspects of existence. said from the ontology. Aristotle made a note: exist in the body. I do not mean that kind of existence as part of being present in the whole surface is away from the main body. it can not exist. Wyatt part of the overall relationship. like the relationship between the head and the body. or one third of the block of wood and a piece of wood. he thinks this part and whole separate from and independent existence. Does not exist among the subjects of the things he said. is actually the main body. which is the body; exist in the body. Something he said. everything is in addition to the body other than - - the number. nature. relationship. location and so on other areas. Aristotle sometimes collectively referred to as Properties (. s) . Greek original meaning is ...... together. these attributes can not leave the subject there. Feet long and the amount is not blending open the main surface exists. white color can not leave the subject exist; leave the subject. there is no number and nature of the Thing. so. Aristotle said there is the principal refers to various properties outside of the body. he said does not exist in the main thing. is body. the example he cites is the people and the individual person. He is not exist among the subjects of standard to distinguish here actually see that it is not the body. Any body. that is. does not exist in the main body. Here is one of the the Aristotle isolated problem. that is. whether the problem of separating the body and properties (body other than all other areas). Aristotle answered in one aspect of the problem: that the property is not and ontology separation of independent existence. As for the other one. i.e. the body can and properties of phase separation and independent existence it" Aristotle comes to this issue below. However. here also leave a question. although the same subject - individual. they also. that the former general. the latter is an individual. they are not separation problem. the general people can and individual phase separation exist? This is the Aristotle explore an important detail in the metaphysical will expand. The expressed subject and being in the main Aristotle predicate analysis here. contribute to the following description of Body body several significance Aristotle discussed in Chapter 8. We called the body he said the following: First. the simple objects. that is. soil. water. fire and such elements. as well as general objects and things from these elements. including animal and divine presence. as well as part of these things. All of these things are called body. because they are not expressed in the main. but other things are expressed in them. Here Aristotle called the object of the body. including the following things: 1. Simple objects. namely. water. fire. earth. these things often referred to as the material elements; 2. The general object of these substances element is called in the context of the article the body of individual things; 3. In particular. he pointed out that animal and the divine presence in the general object here that the divine presence does not mean that such things of God. because he said the composition of the object or material elements. he refers to the sky the stars - day. month. Star. Ancient Greece often are referred to as a sacred object. Metaphysics. Aristotle repeatedly called them holy things. 4. These individual specific part of the object. Exactly what part he did not say where. Part of Aristotle comes to specific things. there are two versions: one refers to a part of the whole thing. for example. head. hand. foot part of the animal. one refers to the specific elements of things. refers to the form and material. Context see from here. he is the former part. rather than the latter. because here. he has not the difference between material and concrete things off. Aristotle made these differences. but here he said object. whether it is simply the object or composition of objects. all refer to the individual. Specific objects corresponds to the specific matters referred to as the first body in the context of articles. But here. he does not point out that these are the first body. Why these objects is called the body he pointed out here only a standard. is that: they are not expressed in the main body. the surface is something else are expressed them. that is. they are subject. is the main word. rather than predicate. Second. that exist among these things. although not expressed in the main. but these things exist because. for example. the soul of the animal existence. This body is characterized by that: it is present in the body. is not expressed body. Things talked about in the context of articles in this feature: specific knowledge of grammar exists in the mind. is not expressed in the main; special white present things. nor is it expressed in the main. However. where said specific knowledge of grammar and special white is not the body. So here. determines whether it is the main features of the body that it is also the reason of this thing. because it Among this thing. so it is the underlying causes of things. The decision for the existence of things. this is the reason. Soul. Greek word. the original meaning of breathing. This animal. only when they breathe and have a life; breathing cessation of life would come to an end. The ancient Greeks to breathe as factors of life. and later became the soul of the mysterious. The soul is the underlying reasons animals have become animals. This reason. it is mainly driven due to the significance of said. Aristotle soul as a body here. Third. is also present in the part of these things. These things as an individual. is subject to the limitations of these parts. by their flag. When the destruction of these parts. the things that the whole will be destroyed. As some people say. the destruction of the surface of the object. the entire object is destroyed; destruction of the line. the surface will destroy; destruction point. the line also destroy. Some people think that. generally. the number is with this characteristic. the number destruction. anything can exist; number is a part of things. it is also a limit everything 's. Aristotle said some people. the Pythagoreans. They believe that the number is the ontology of things. The number is a part of things. but it limits things become a sign of things. all things can not exist. if the number of destruction. From this youngster righteousness. the Pythagoreans number is the ontology of things. As a reason. number is in the form of things because of. Aristotle in Metaphysics Volume V. accept the Pythagoreans say that number is the ontology of things. Later. however. in the last two volumes of the metaphysics. he does not recognize the number is independent separation ontology. Aristotle made some argument to refute the number is separated with the argument of the existence of the body. Fourth. in essence. its formula (logos) is defined. is also referred to as the body of things. Aristotle first explicitly put forward the essence is the idea of "the body. Of nature. but only briefly - the formula is defined. not for more instructions. Thought Aristotle to VII (Z) Expand detail. After the above four body speak. Aristotle summed up: the body has two meanings: A body is a body (matrix). it is no longer expressed any else; B. ontology a . can be separated - with such properties. the form of things. Satisfaction guaranteed,or money back.
2
9787010026060 - WANG ZI SONG: Aristotle on the body of doctrine [Paperback]
WANG ZI SONG

Aristotle on the body of doctrine [Paperback]

Lieferung erfolgt aus/von: Deutschland PB NW FE

ISBN: 9787010026060 bzw. 7010026068, Sprache unbekannt, Taschenbuch, neu, Erstausgabe.

74,39 + Versand: 11,59 = 85,98
unverbindlich
Von Händler/Antiquariat, liu xing [54261761], JiangSu, JS, China.
Ship out in 2 business day, And Fast shipping, Free Tracking number will be provided after the shipment.Paperback Pages Number: 360 Language: Simplified Chinese Publisher: People's Publishing House; 1st edition (October 1. 1997). Paperback Pages Number: 360 Language: Simplified Chinese Publisher: People's Publishing House; a ( October 1. 1997). Aristotle on the body of doctrine. Introduction: commitment to the domestic book publishing is the purpose of my community has always been. Credit goes to generation after generation of experts and scholars in the history of philosophy for their support. and published many important works of the world's attention on a regular basis with the treasures of precious academic value and ideological wealth. More scale in order to make it even more systems. old and new scholars to study the access and cultural heritage of these books now merged into philosophical the Shijia Wen library . Philosophy is the living soul of civilization. We would like to The Shijia Wen library of the philosophy for the philosophy of prosperity and progress of civilization to make some modest. We also expect this library to continue to add new masterpiece.Four Satisfaction guaranteed,or money back.
3
9787010026060 - WANG ZI SONG: Aristotle on the body of doctrine [Paperback](Chinese Edition)
WANG ZI SONG

Aristotle on the body of doctrine [Paperback](Chinese Edition)

Lieferung erfolgt aus/von: Deutschland PB NW FE

ISBN: 9787010026060 bzw. 7010026068, Sprache unbekannt, Taschenbuch, neu, Erstausgabe.

91,08 + Versand: 8,87 = 99,95
unverbindlich
Von Händler/Antiquariat, liu xing [54261761], JiangSu, JS, China.
Paperback Pages Number: 360 Language: Simplified Chinese Publisher: People's Publishing House; 1st edition (October 1. 1997). Paperback Pages Number: 360 Language: Simplified Chinese Publisher: People's Publishing House; a ( October 1. 1997). Aristotle on the body of doctrine. Introduction: commitment to the domestic book publishing is the purpose of my community has always been. Credit goes to generation after generation of experts and scholars in the history of philosophy for their support.
Lade…